Skip to content

feat: promote OTel apachereceiver definition to prod with k8s support#2998

Open
ujwalsah wants to merge 1 commit into
newrelic:mainfrom
ujwalsah:feat/apacheserver-entity-definitions-prod
Open

feat: promote OTel apachereceiver definition to prod with k8s support#2998
ujwalsah wants to merge 1 commit into
newrelic:mainfrom
ujwalsah:feat/apacheserver-entity-definitions-prod

Conversation

@ujwalsah

@ujwalsah ujwalsah commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Relevant information

Api Review Board (ARB)

ARB Jira ticket:
https://new-relic.atlassian.net/browse/NR-570311

Summary

  • Promotes the staging OTel Apache receiver entity definition to production
  • Removes definition.stg.yml and replaces definition.yml with the staging content
  • Adds k8s support (cluster name, namespace, pod name) and host attributes (host.name, host.id) with TTL

Related

Checklist

  • The value of the attribute marked as identifier will be unique and valid.
  • I've confirmed that my entity type wasn't already defined.
  • I've linked an ARB ticket & received approval from API Review Board in order to make these changes

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

@entityBot entityBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

beep boop bop.

I have found some errors processing these changes:

  • No valid, approved ARB ticket found in the PR description. This PR has to be reviewed by the API Review Board, please include a link to the ticket of that review in the PR description. Check how to start the process here or reach #api-review-board channel in case of doubts

@entityBot
entityBot requested a review from a team July 1, 2026 09:17

@nr-ksteinbach nr-ksteinbach left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@entityBot
entityBot requested a review from a team July 1, 2026 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants